Philosophy of Structures

 
Beware of electronic databases: Here is what I could save from the archives of the course, decimated by a server crash and a laptop theft: 
The Ice Pantheon
Some more pics of the Ice Pantheon taken by Dirk Hoeltje 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

SESSION 1
Friday Morning January 12 2001
to session 2

Introduction
Dynamical systems versus linear systems
Fractal geometry and Chaos theory

Concepts to take note of:
What is a fractal
What is fractal dimension
What is a dynamical or non-linear system?
What is a linear system?
("as predictable as clockwork")
What does the expression " The straw that brake the camel's back" mean in dynamical or linear terms?
What is a chaotic system?
examples: weather, turbulence, human behaviour, predator-prey relationship
stock markets, in short most complicated systems are dynamical systems
readings  :
 James Gleick,CHAOS, Making a New Science
Assignment for next week: bring in a fractal and discuss its particular nature

 Topic of the week: The City as a non-linear system b_evans.htmlb_crilly.htmlb_simpson.htmlb_catch.html  b_inch.html b_king.htmlb_smith.htmlbksonud.htmlnewvill.html

The whole series of articles can be found here:http://www2.rudi.net/ej/udq/59/cover.html

another link Online Planning Journal May 1998 - Articles

A nice quote:http://www.temple.edu/isllc/newfolk/consider1.html

Nice excerpt of the week:

Applying chaos theory to social sciences "conspiracy theory..."

In 1845, P.F. Verhulst introduced a new term to the exponential
        growth equation that described the way a population develops in
        a closed area. He multiplied Xn by a new term (1-Xn) which, in
        effect, multiplied Xn by itself. This procedure introduces feedback
        and non linearity into the equation, which results in yearly
        population growth dependent on what came before, non linearly.
        Such factors as the effect of the various environmental factors on
        the way populations develop could now be calculated.

        Verhulst's equation has significance that extends beyond the
        quantitative measure of populations:

             Verhulst's modified equation has a host of applications. It
             has been pressed into service by entomologists to
             compute the effect of pests in orchards and by geneticists
             to gauge the change in the frequency of certain genes in a
             population. It has] been applied to the way a rumor
             spreads. At first a rumor will expand exponentially until
             nearly everyone has encountered it. Then the rate will
             drop off quickly as more and more people say "I heard that
             one." Verhulst's equation also applies to theories of
             learning. What is learned now is related to the amount of
             information learned previously. Learning first increases,
             but after some time the learner becomes saturated so that
             more effort brings only minimal results (Briggs and Peat
             1989, 56-57).

        Rumor, gossip, learning, narratives, as well as conspiracies are
        iterative phenomena, recurrent events that move through
        populations as part of the social dynamic of cultural groups. The
        rapid rise and spread of conspiracy theories around the death of
        Diana Spencer is an example of the continuous feedback that
        chaotic behaviors produce in living cultures.

        Feedback, or iteration, using the output of one function as the
        input of another, continually "reabsorbs or enfolds what has come
        before" (66) indicates the presence of chaos. This is not the
        chaos of randomness and disorder. Instead, it is the chaos found
        in nonlinear dynamics, more commonly known as chaos theory.
        There are two distinct streams of chaos theory--the strange
        attractor and the order out of chaos branches. The first
        emphasizes the hidden order that exists within seemingly random
        patterns. It separates the word chaos from its connotations of
        randomness and reveals the deep structures of encoded order
        that exist within chaotic systems.

        The second branch investigates the spontaneous
        self-organization of systems that emerge "far from equilibrium".
        Commonly called dissipative structures, these systems are able
        to maintain their identity by remaining open to the flux of their
        environments. Since the emergence of chaos theory in the
        mid-nineteen eighties, more and more links have been made
        between abstract sciences and physical systems. Culture is one
        of those systems. Culture can be viewed as a complex organic or
        living system, once we recognize the prevalence of chaotic
        behavior in physical and cultural systems. Culture can be
        modeled as a living system that exhibits the characteristics of
        chaotic behavior: non linearity, complex forms, recursive
        symmetries between scale levels, sensitivity to initial conditions
        and feedback mechanisms (Hayles:11-14, 1990).

        Nonlinear modeling of culture is achieved in the introduction of
        James G. Miller's living systems theory (1978, 1990) which
        defines all living entities as complexly structured open systems.
        Miller identifies eight levels of increasing complexity as living
        systems: cells, organs, organisms, groups, organizations,
        communities, societies, and supranational systems (1990). When
        we consider social systems accordingly, the interaction of the
        physical and the cultural becomes an essential element in
        understanding complex phenomena. A system does not exist in
        total isolation. Instead, a living system has boundaries that are
        permeable, which allows the system to import the energy
        essential to maintain itself.

A good link on linear versus dynamic: (an article trying to relate chaos theory and fractal geometry to the legal definition of 'Obscenity'
http://www.tryoung.com/chaos/025cislo.html
Characteristics of Fractal Geometry

As was mentioned above, fractal objects or images are characteristically complex objects. Fractals, such as the Mandelbrot set, are also
characteristically "self-similar" at all levels of magnification. This refers to an object’s repetitive pattern. A leaf, for example, may repeat the
same patterns found in the entire plant from which it came (think of the fern plant). This description, so pervasive in objects of the natural
world, is also relevant to mathematically generated images, such as the Mandelbrot set.

Without getting into too much detail, the Mandelbrot set (among other generated fractals) is created by running a non-linear equation and
adding the product of that equation to a constant. This sum is fed back, or iterated, into the equation. After each iteration, the product of the
equation is plotted on the complex plane. The axes of the complex plane are graded with coordinates that allow the determination of inclusion
in or exclusion from the Mandelbrot set to made; the Mandelbrot set consists in the products of those equations that fall within the
circumference of two on the complex plane after an arbitrary number of iterations. This work is carried out on the computer which assigns a
color, or gradation of gray, given parameters, to each pixel on the computer screen where the products are plotted. The result is the
mathematically generated fractal image known as the Mandelbrot set (Appendix A, Figure 1).

The term "self-similarity" in relation to the Mandelbrot set (our second characteristic of fractals under consideration) not only refers to the
similarity noticed at first glance, as described with the fern plant, it also refers to a more deeply rooted structural similarity that is found by
"zooming in" on the border area of the image (this is facilitated by use of the computer). Magnification of this border area reveals smaller or
"baby Mandelbrots" that are equally complex; this pattern of similarity goes on ad infinitum.

Another characteristic of fractals is termed "high-sensitivity-to initial-conditions" [HSIC]. This term applies most conspicuously to
mathematically generated fractals, being their genesis is understood as coming from the finite mathematical equation; thus, the (system’s)
initial conditions are easily accessible. Briefly, this means that when running equations for the Mandelbrot set, for instance, two separate
equations that are identical, though have slightly different input values, can have remarkably different results after iteration. The difference of
even one digit in the thousandth decimal place can make one equation part of the set and the other a case of utter divergence after iteration.
The initial conditions in this case are the two equations that we started with before iteration. High sensitivity to these initial conditions is the
result of iteration; the difference between the two original equations is amplified due to each iteration.

So, we have described three characteristics of fractal geometry: (1) it describes irregular objects or images by an assignment of complexity,
(2) the objects or images described are self-similar at all levels of magnification, and (3) these objects or images possess
high-sensitivity-to-initial-conditions. Our next tool of DST to consider is called the "bifurcation diagram."