|
|
QUERIES:
|
![]() |
| Figure 1. Airport Programming (Adler, David [ed.]. "Metric Handbook: Planning
and Design Data, Second Edition". Oxford: Architectural Press.). |
![]() |
| Figure 2. Model of Normative Theory (Lang, 1987). |
![]() |
| Figure 3. Model of Positive Theory (Lang, 1987). |
Architectural researcher Jon Lang, one of my professors while attending the University of New South Wales, Sydney, emphasized the significance of being aware of the role of environmental experience in architectural theory. Whereas architectural education has focused on normative theory -- an examination of the designer's intentions through the study of aesthetic or compositional principles (see Figure 2) -- it is only one approach to architectural theory. Positive theory, on the other hand (see Figure 3), "encompasses our understanding of the natural and the built environments and their roles in people's lives" (Lang, 1987). It is a study of what possibilities the physical environment affords users.
The airport is one of the more experience-laden typologies of contemporary architecture. Consequently, the research basis of this proposal is highly experiential. It is designed to be a study of architecture that necessarily involves the researcher. The very nature of an airport requires its study both as an observer as well as a user.
This approach does not dwell on programming or utility to the exclusion of all other aspects of architecture. Formal and symbolic aesthetics have a significant impact on behavioural experience. Structure and building construction play an equally important role. It is the comprehensive experiential effect of the architecture that will be investigated.
The study of the use of an airport will not be a quantitative one. Indeed, statistics are readily available on the flow of traffic within and between airports, yet these issues are not architectural, despite their effects on the architecture of the airport. Nor is the study intended to be a utilitarian one. If one wanted to study the programming of an airport, it would be a repetitive study of variations of the same model: a study that could be completed with physically experiencing any of the airports (see Figure 1). Again, this aspect does have consequences on the architecture of the airport, but is not in the realm of architectural discourse.
However, the application of behavioural sciences to the built environment is rarely within the common scope of architectural discourse today. However, it is a body of knowledge that is essential to the design profession. This body of knowledge must complement normative theory in the design process.
It is intended that this research into the experiential nature of airports will guide and enrich the design process that I will be undertaking this coming fall, as I work on my design thesis project, as part of my professional Master of Architecture.
This study will involve some preliminary study of behavioural sciences and methods of observation. Further research into the design of each of the selected airports will also be necessary. However, the bulk of evaluation will be based on an experiential review of the eight airports selected, as indicated in the Project Schedule. The experience will be studied, from the approach to the airport, through the airport and up to the arrival in the city centre, and again from leaving the city to take-off.
The means of study will primarily be through observation. Sketching will play a vital role in the recording of these findings and experiences. Sketching will include both place making studies and experiential recording. Some of Kevin Lynch's ideas of image mapping will be used to study the spaces of an airport, as well as other methods professed by Jon Lang and Steen Eiler Rasmussen. Some photography will also be used to record hard data, but its use may be limited due to the secure nature of an airport.
Proposed Itinerary
The following airports have been selected as potential sites to visit. The choice of airports was based one or more of the following aspects: the scale of the airport (building size and traffic volumes), the size of the city served, the age of the airport and the project's architect. It is by no means an exhaustive list of significant Asian airports, but it is intended to adequately represent recent trends in airport development in the region.
It is proposed to travel to these airports, in the approximate order presented, from the end of April through to mid-May, 2005. A total of three weeks of travel would allow for a few days spent in each city and its surrounding areas, further investigating urban patterns, connections and spaces. The precise itinerary, as well as the actual number and choice of airports to be visited will depend on the level of support received, as well as the availability and cost of flights in the region.
![]() |
| Map of Asia, showing the proposed selection of airports. |
Chek Lap Kok Airport (1998)
Hong Kong, China
Architect: Foster and Partners
Canton Baiyun Airport (2004)
Guangzhou, China
Architect: Parson, URS Corporation
Shanghai¨CPudong Airport (1999)
Shanghai, China
Architect: Paul Andreu/ADP
Beijing Capital International Airport (1999, 2004)
Beijing, China
Architect: Beijing Institute of Architecture and Design
Incheon International Airport (2001)
Seoul, South Korea
Architect: Fentress Bradburn
Kansai International Airport (1994)
Osaka, Japan
Architect: Renzo Piano, ADP, Noriaki Okabe
Changi International Airport, Terminal 3 (2003)
Singapore, Singapore
Architect: SOM
Kuala Lumpur Airport (1998)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Architect: Kisho Kurokawa Architect, Arkitek Jururancag
*Suvarnabhumi Airport (2005)
Bangkok, Thailand
Architect: Murphy/Jahn, TAMS, ACT
*Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 (2007)
Beijing, China
Architect: Foster and Partners
* indicates an airport under development, which will not be ready in time for the proposed trip. Nevertheless, the projects will still be studied by means of a literature review and such findings will be included in the final report.
Project Budget
The amount being requested for project related expenses, $ 2918.00, represents the cost of airfare for travel between the listed airports, as well as the cost of some basic supplies, required to conduct the architectural research.
The airfares listed are based on the bestpriced student fares that are currently available for the proposed time period, and are priced in Canadian dollars. Airfare is subject to fluctuations in price and in the exchange rate.
With the intention of working in the Pacific region this summer, I would assume the cost of travel between Canada and Hong Kong, which would be the main hub for my travels to the aforementioned airports.
Additional funds have also been requested from the School of Architecture at McGill University. A similar traveling scholarship proposal, for up to $2000.00, has been submitted. These supplementary funds would cover general costs, namely accommodation, meals, and transportation. These additional costs have been indicated to show the overall scale of the entire project.
Should I receive this scholarship, I will complete my proposed project within the limits of the budget available for related expenses, regardless of the decision on any outside funding.
Selected Readings
Lang, Jon. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lynch, Kevin. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pearman, Hugh. (2004). Airports: A Century of Architecture. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers.
Rasmussen, Steen Eiler. (1959). Experiencing Architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.