|
Analysis:
Unlike exterior elliptical
colonnaded mass, interior rectilinear box wrapped by a classical ellipse is
extremely minimal keenly corresponding to the function of the library rather than
to aestheticism. This dichotomy of the contexts of the building responses to
both top to bottom and bottom to top design approaches.
My interpretation of
Safdie’s design is that he might have tried to provide a public icon which
wasn’t prevalent in downtown Vancouver at that time. This can be understood as proactive
approach by an architect toward the public in design to provide easily
appreciable architectural design forms.
It is invaluable for public
architecture being understandable by the public because public architecture
is not for certain aristocrats but for all kinds of people (public); public
architecture has to be public’s architecture.
Safdie’s library is very
community-interactive in the way users are drawn from an external piazza into
a mall-like arcade which curves beneath a glass roof.
The program of the library
– incorporating mall like features into the interior arcade - is very
thoughtful because it breaks the negative notions of a library as a static and
quiet studying place. People really love being in the library enjoying space
of the arcade where lots of events happen.
However, unlike interior
arcade producing vibrant and multifaceted activities exterior piazza seems to
be somewhat deserted; not even a single bench is placed despite large public
circulation and mild temperature. External piazza should have been designed
to promote more interactive socio-spatial use.
|