|
Pei’s design approach was
closely tied to the historical interpretation of the Louvre, and he also
tried to reflect vernacular context of Parisian landscape. Pei had read widely on the works of Le Notre, the greatest of French
landscape architects, and was intrigued by the crisp geometry of his arrangements
of plants pathways, and water elements.
Such a pattern resembled
the floor plan of a pyramid. Its stylistic neutrality which would blend with
the classical symmetry of the Louvre and the gardens of the Tuileries to the
west was understood by Pei, and he incorporated glass which is virtually
transparent and will intrude only minimally on the view of the existing
architecture. Also Smaller pyramids were planned to bring in light and to
allow visitors to orient themselves in the large UG museum space.
Monumentality can bee seen
in Pei’s pyramid, but we shouldn’t assimilate Pei’s with Egyptian’s; Egyptian
precedent was about mass and impenetrability, while his pyramid was about
lightness and transparency.
Glass pyramid allows view
of the old buildings through the glass from below overcoming negative bias
about being underground, and it actually amplifies the appreciation of what
had gone before by looking upward.
The glass pyramid entrance by Pei is very dramatic
and contentious regarding its surrounding historical context. It might seem
to be very offensive to its urban context but its pure and simple form and
monumental scale are in keeping with the grandeur of the courtyard with no
conflict; Pei’s very stark and contrast design concept is neither aggressive nor subservient but to complement
through restraint, heightening the impact of history.
|