| # people surveyed |
175
|
|||||
| # people that replied |
35
|
|||||
| % upon which survey is based |
20%
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
u1
|
u2
|
u3
|
m1
|
graduate
|
%
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| % response |
12
|
12
|
6
|
50
|
20
|
-
|
|
| yes! to learning to draft by hand (%) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
6
|
23
|
|
| yes! to swearing by cad (%) |
6
|
11
|
3
|
20
|
9
|
49
|
|
| yes! to teach cad as of 1st year |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
|
| like the blackader library where it is |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
31
|
|
| would use it more if it was closer |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
51
|
|
questions 4 & 5 - given the chance to improve the school, an overwhelming amount of students were quick to point out that the studios and computer labs would definitely need to be upgraded. other spaces mentioned were improving the workshop facilities and photolabs, having a student lounge for architecture students with fridge and kitchenette, larger crit rooms and more wall space for exhibiting work, a media room (like icc) for students to be able to borrow equipment such as (digital) cameras, projectors, laptops, zip drives..., which can be merged with a printing room where computers, photocopy machines, scanners, plotters are all together, another lecture room like 212. students also felt that the security issue in the school needs to be dealt with if more equipment is to be added, as well as a (larger) support staff for the facilities. as well, regarding the curriculum, students felt that there should be more interaction between the different years of study and the different schools.