
La Tourette (Henze 1963)
|
Schools began with a man under a tree, who did not know he was teacher, discussing his realization with a few, who did not know they were students. The students aspired that their sons also listen to such a man. Spaces were erected and the first schools became. It can also be said that the existence-will of school was there even before the circumstances of the man under the tree.
La Tourette is
the home of the Dominican monks in Eveux-sur-l’Arbresle, France and defies
the visitor’s historically trained eye that interprets it as anything but
a monastery. However, Le Corbusier’s design generated no new rules,
it only simplified those dating to the 13th Century down to the essentials
and amplified them subversively in a truly expressive sanctuary.
This expression fully adopted the premise that architecture begins with
humankind and “his relationships with his fellow men, the suprapersonal,
corporate forms which he creates in conjunction with them and their position
in relation to God” (Henze 1966, 9). The grounds for the architectonic
plan are found in the life and combined ideas of the men whom the building
was intended to serve, and architecture that strengthens and confirms the
inhabitants and their basic communal institutions in self-discovery.
The conception of La Tourette as a node where many formal and intellectual
paths converge is an extremely critical interpretation of the institution
and fundamental to the premise of Urban Shadow.
La Tourette is
described by Alberto Perez-Gomez (1997) as an edifice where time is no
longer linear; where our participation with the building adds up into layers
that both reveal and conceal, never resulting in a final clarification
of the “idea” of the building. The element of “mystery” is one that
reappears in many institutional precedents researched for this thesis;
the irreconcilable reconciled. La Tourette presents “architecture
as a verb (ritual making)” (Perez-Gomez 1997, 368) and, as such, constitutes
the experiential interaction between the building and the inhabitants that
it services. Kahn’s doctrine is further corroborated by Perez-Gomez
(1997) who states that “architectural meaning appears in our intersubjective
space as in the space of a metaphor, as a recognition of that which cannot
be reduced to words and yet begs to be named.” A description that
parallels the Nature of Art revealed in the description of Lionardo’s “La
Gioconda.” It is this fundamental function of the institution that
I wish to extract and implement within the context of Art as a mechanism
to generate the mystery that endows inspiration; La Tourette substantiating
confirming any doubts that architecture indeed can satisfy such ambition.
|
| <
|